Turn fragmented engineering records into a review-ready RCM starting point.
AndonEAM organizes available asset documentation into draft functions, failure modes, effects, and maintenance tasks. Source context is retained where available, and customer engineers review every output before it becomes an approved strategy.
The Problem
Every reliability engineer knows this feeling: you have done the workshops, analysis, and documentation, yet the resulting strategy can still be difficult to update as assets and operating evidence change. The methodology is sound. The process around it deserves better.
The actual schedule and cost depend on asset scope, source quality, review depth, and the customer's governance process.
Collecting source material, facilitating reviews, and resolving engineering comments can make an RCM programme difficult to sustain.
Facilitation, documentation, and senior-engineer review all compete with day-to-day reliability work.
Large matrices are difficult to version, review consistently, and keep connected to their source evidence.
Asset modifications, operating changes, and new failure evidence can make an approved strategy due for revision.
How It Works
AndonEAM connects source data, structured drafts, engineering review, and approved downstream records in a governed maintenance workflow.
Bring the manuals, P&IDs, maintenance-history exports, and datasheets included in the agreed project scope. Supported formats, scan quality, and any preparation needed are validated during onboarding.
The system proposes an equipment hierarchy, component functions, and candidate failure modes from the available sources. Each item stays reviewable and is treated as a draft until a customer engineer validates it.
A configurable workflow uses the customer's taxonomy and can reference ISO 14224 terminology and SAE JA1011 review criteria to draft an FMEA and maintenance rationale. Engineers validate standards alignment, technical accuracy, and site suitability.
A card-based review workflow lets authorized engineers inspect source context, edit proposed fields, record comments, and approve only the work they have validated.
Approved records can be exported or transferred through integrations included in the customer scope. Field mappings, master data, and downstream release controls are validated before operational use.
Capabilities
Extracts candidate engineering context from the structured and unstructured source files accepted for a project. Results depend on document quality and remain available for correction during review.
The workflow combines available source records, configured RCM criteria, and customer operating context to produce a reviewable draft. It does not replace engineering judgement or guarantee that every proposed failure mode is correct.
Can be configured to organize information using ISO 14224 terminology and SAE JA1011 review criteria. The customer remains responsible for determining conformance with applicable standards and internal procedures.
Configured approval gates let authorized engineers review failure matrices, edit proposed task intervals, challenge the rationale, and record their decision history before approved data is released.
Built For
Get Started
See how AndonEAM could fit your reliability programme. Scope, source data, integrations, governance, and deployment requirements are validated with your team.